AVALIAÇÃO DE DESEMPENHO DOS ESTILOS DE DECISÃO: ANÁLISE DA LITERATURA E OPORTUNIDADES DE PESQUISA

Ernando Fagundes, Sandra Rolim Ensslin, Darci Schnorrenberger

Resumo


As pessoas apresentam diferentes estilos cognitivos, de modo que reagem de formas diferentes ao processo de tomada de decisões. As decisões tomadas pelos decisores, mesmo que com mesmas habilidades e num mesmo contexto, não serão as mesmas e apresentarão resultados diferentes. Desse modo, o presente estudo teve como objetivo verificar como a Avaliação de Desempenho (AD) é apresentada, na literatura, em língua inglesa, quando utilizada para avaliar o desempenho dos estilos de tomada de decisão, apontando possíveis lacunas para estudo. Para este estudo, optou-se pelo Knowledge Developement Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C) como instrumento de intervenção, já que o objetivo da pesquisa é gerar conhecimento nos pesquisadores sobre o tema, com base em um fragmento da literatura, a fim de identificar possíveis lacunas de pesquisa. Desse modo, foi possível realizar análises bibliométrica e sistemática, apontando oportunidades para futuras pesquisas acadêmicas e estudos práticos. As pesquisas acerca da AD dos Estilos de Decisão se mostram relevantes e as oportunidades apontadas devem ser exploradas para que se desenvolvam estudos na área.


Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Allwood, C. M., & Salo, I. (2012). Decision-making styles and stress. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(1), 34.

Azadeh, A., Mokhtari, Z., Sharahi, Z. J., & Zarrin, M. (2015). An integrated experiment for identification of best decision styles and teamworks with respect to HSE and ergonomics program: the case of a large oil refinery. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 85, 30-44.

Baykasoğlu, A., & Gölcük, İ. (2015). Development of a novel multiple-attribute decision making model via fuzzy cognitive maps and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. Information Sciences, 301, 75-98.

Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305-327.

Bortoluzzi, S. C.; Ensslin, S. R.; Ensslin, L.; Valmorbida, S. M. I. (2013). Performance evaluation of small and medium enterprises (smes) networks: gaps and opportunities research. Revista Gestão Industrial, 9 (4), 886-906.

Carneiro-da-Cunha, J. A., Hourneaux Jr, F., & Corrêa, H. L. (2016). Evolution and chronology of the organisational performance measurement field. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 17(2), 223-240.

Cools, E., & Van den Broeck, H. (2007). Development and validation of the Cognitive Style Indicator. The Journal of Psychology, 141(4), 359-387.

Cristofaro, M. (2016). Cognitive styles in dynamic decision making: a laboratory experiment. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 15(1), 53-82.

Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016). Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics, 108(2), 595-611.

Dias, L. C., & Tsoukiàs, A. (2003). On the constructive and other approaches in decision aiding. In Proceedings of the 57th meeting of the EURO MCDA working group.

Dutra, A., Ripoll-Feliu, V. M., Fillol, A. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2015). The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(2), 243-269.

Eberlin, R. J., & Tatum, B. C. (2008). Making just decisions: organizational justice, decision making, and leadership. Management Decision, 46(2), 310-329.

Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., Imlau, J. M., & Chaves, L. C. (2014). Processo de mapeamento das publicações científicas de um tema: portfólio bibliográfico e análise bibliométrica sobre Avaliação de Desempenho de cooperativas de produção agropecuária. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 52(3), 587-608.

Faraci, P., Lock, M., & Wheeler, R. (2013). Assessing leadership decision-making styles: psychometric properties of the leadership judgement indicator. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 6, 117.

Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282.

Frankovsky, M., Birknerova, Z., & Zbihlejova, L. (2016). Assessment of Occurrence Predictors of Cognitive Distortions in Managerial Decisions. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2), 61-70.

Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2011). Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 569-594.

Ghalayini, A. M., & Noble, J. S. (1996). The changing basis of performance measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(8), 63-80.

Gray, D. E. (2012). Pesquisa no mundo real. Penso Editora. (Porto Alegre)

Grosswiele, L., Röglinger, M., & Friedl, B. (2013). A decision framework for the consolidation of performance measurement systems. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1016-1029.

Groves, K., Vance, C., & Paik, Y. (2008). Linking linear/nonlinear thinking style balance and managerial ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 305-325.

Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, D. T. (2005). An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 417-448.

Kelly, K. (2010). Accuracy of relative weights on multiple leading performance measures: Effects on managerial performance and knowledge. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(2), 577-608.

Kunz, J. (2010). Complexity of performance measures and decision quality. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 3(4), 311-337.

Landry, M., Banville, C., & Oral, M. (1996). Model legitimization in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 443-457.

Lebas, M. J. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1-3), 23-35.

Lindblom, A., Olkkonen, R., & Mitronen, L. (2008). Cognitive styles of contractually integrated retail entrepreneurs: a survey study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(6), 518-532.

Luft, J., Shields, M. D., & Thomas, T. F. (2016). Additional information in accounting reports: Effects on management decisions and subjective performance evaluations under causal ambiguity. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 526-550.

McKenna, J., Hyllegard, K., & Linder, R. (2003). Linking psychological type to financial decision-making. Financial Counseling and Planning, 14(1), 19-29.

Micheli, P., & Manzoni, J. F. (2010). Strategic performance measurement: Benefits, limitations and paradoxes. Long Range Planning, 43(4), 465-476.

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.

Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L., & Chong, V. K. (2017). Effect of transformational-leadership style and management control system on managerial performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 202-213.

Otley, D. (2001). Extending the boundaries of management accounting research: developing systems for performance management. The British Accounting Review, 33(3), 243-261.

Pennino, C. M. (2002). Is decision style related to moral development among managers in the US?. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 337-347.

Penolazzi, B., Leone, L., & Russo, P. M. (2013). Individual differences and decision making: when the lure effect of gain is a matter of size. PloS one, 8(3), e58946.

Prodanov, C. C., & de Freitas, E. C. (2013). Metodologia do Trabalho Científico: Métodos e Técnicas da Pesquisa e do Trabalho Acadêmico. 2. ed. Editora Feevale.

Taticchi, P., Balachandran, K., & Tonelli, F. (2012). Performance measurement and management systems: state of the art, guidelines for design and challenges. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(2), 41-54.

Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., & Cagnazzo, L. (2010). Performance measurement and management: a literature review and a research agenda. Measuring business excellence, 14(1), 4-18.

Thiel, G. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2017). Street Lighting Management and Performance Evaluation: Opportunities and Challenges. Lex Localis, 15(2), 303-328.

Valmorbida, S. M. I., Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., & Ripoll-Feliu, V. M. (2014). Avaliação de Desempenho para auxílio na gestão de universidades públicas: análise da literatura para identificação de oportunidades de pesquisas. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 17(3), 4-28.

Valmorbida, S. M. I., Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., & Ripoll-Feliu, V. M. (2016). World University Rankings: What they Say International Studies?. REICE-Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en Educacion, 14(2), 5-29.

Van Camp, J., & Braet, J. (2016). Taxonomizing performance measurement systems’ failures. International journal of productivity and performance management, 65(5), 672-693.

Watts, S., Shankaranarayanan, G., & Even, A. (2009). Data quality assessment in context: A cognitive perspective. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 202-211.


Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Eletrônica Científica do CRA-PR - RECC

##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##